Need for expansion of forensic psychiatrists' role in sexual harassment cases.
نویسنده
چکیده
Apparently intimidated by the current climate of political correctness, forensic psychiatrists in sexual harassment cases often limit themselves to a determination of damages. Yet they are in a unique position to help in the resolution of more complex issues: they need not merely accept plaintiffs' allegations at face value, as treating psychiatrists generally do, but can assess credibility and identify psychodynamics that could be crucial in the clarification of legal questions such as "welcomeness." This article discusses the significance of pertinent data, such as a history of childhood sexual abuse, but emphasizes that such information does not necessarily invalidate the plaintiffs allegations. It also reviews the obstacles that can stand in the way of a complete psychiatric examination and thereby limit the forensic psychiatrist's ability to help the courts. Increased involvement by forensic psychiatrists could contribute to a more impartial evaluation of sexual harassment cases and help establish the distinction between valid claims and frivolous ones.
منابع مشابه
Sexual harassment: issues for forensic psychiatrists.
The number of civil lawsuits related to sexual harassment is increasing. The author bases this paper on her experience as an expert witness in 28 sexual harassment cases over the last 10 years. She delineates the psychological and legal issues about which forensic psychiatrists may be consulted. These include issues related to helping a jury determine the veracity of the complaints of harassmen...
متن کاملAddressing bias in the forensic assessment of sexual harassment claims.
This article addresses unique biases that arise in the assessment of sexual harassment claims by forensic psychiatrists. These include gender biases, diagnostic biases, sociopolitical biases, and bias that arises from lack of knowledge regarding sexual harassment or lack of formal psychiatric training. Forensic psychiatrists are ethically obligated to strive for objectivity and honesty in their...
متن کاملCommentary on Logical Operations in Theory-Building Case Studies Forensic Evaluations Advance Scientific Theory: Assessing Causation of Harm
As a basis for psychological theory construction, Stiles (2009) proposes connecting theory and practice in single, qualitative case studies as an alternative to group-experimental approaches. In this paper, we apply Stiles’ model to determine the causation of psychological injuries within individual cases in forensic settings—in other words, to develop a theory of causation within individual fo...
متن کاملFactitious sexual harassment.
Among those claims that trivialize true sexual harassment is a type that the author has come to recognize as factitious (i.e., prompted by the lure of victim status). Women who file factitious sexual harassment cases usually voice their allegations in a very convincing manner and, in the presence of contradictory findings, present a diagnostic challenge. Forensic clinicians must be able to reco...
متن کاملThe harassment of forensic psychiatrists outside of court.
Violence by psychiatric patients has received increasing attention; there have been reports of attacks by inpatients, 1-4 emergency room visitors,5 and surveys of assaults by all types of patients.13 Despite their association with patients who might be expected to be more dangerous than the general psychiatric population, there have been few attempts to study the experiences of forensic psychia...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law
دوره 23 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1995